Cyburbia - The Urban Planning Portal
      Home      Forums      Gallery      PlanningWiki      Site of the Day      Voices      Bookstore      Gear      Advertise      About Cyburbia     
The Cyburbia Forums: because listservs are boring.

You have not registered a Cyburbia Forums account
(Or you have not logged in yet.)

This annoying message will appear on every screen until you register an account or log in. Membership is completely free, and we promise not to send you any spam.

The Cyburbia Forums is the oldest and most active English language urban planning message board on the Internet, and one of the small number of online communities where members enjoy intelligent, troll-free discussion. Cyburbia has hundreds of active members, yet is a strong community full of creative, friendly, and occasionally offbeat planners, planning students, architects, urbanists and other like-minded people who care about and/or help shape the built environment. Cyburbia Forums members enjoy a sense of community and camaraderie that is unmatched by any planning-related web site or listserv. We'd love to have you join us as another Cyburbian.


Go back   Cyburbia Forums | Urban Planning Community

Register Now for FREE!
Complete the form below to instantly register to the Cyburbia Forums. We promise not to spam you or give your registration information to others.

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Real name (will not be visible to the public, or given to other)    Location (City/municipality, state/province/region)
 
Human verification: random question
  I agree to forum rules 

Sponsors

User login

Buzz: planning RSS feeds

Who's online
There are currently 9 users and 107 guests online.

Online users

  • DetroitPlanner
  • ofos
  • btrage
  • Otis
  • Tranplanner
  • SGB
  • ursus
  • macsurf
  • kjelsadek

RSS feeds

Front page: RSS

Forums: RSS 1.0

Forums: RSS 2.0

Forums: XML

Threadspotting and Job Board webfeeds for your site


Social bookmarks
Technorati   del.icio.us   Connotea   ma.gnolia.com    furl   Backflip
Simpy   Squidoo   Wink   Yahoomyweb   RawSugar   Blogmarks   

Google search
Google

 
Cyburbia's giant list of planning job sites
By Dan at 2010/06/23 - 4:00pm

Looking for a planning job in the United States, but disappointed because the American Planning Association Jobs Online page is down? Check out Cyburbia's large list of planning job sites The list includes links to planning-related job listings at APA state and division sites, other planning organizations, municipal leagues, and other Web sites, as well as planning job listing pages in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Hong Kong, and Singapore. In the meantime, let's hope the APA Jobs Online section becomes live again shortly.


Are the days of animated sign bans over?
By Dan at 2010/04/29 - 4:00pm

On the way back from the dog park yesterday, I drove down Niagara Falls Boulevard, a busy commercial strip north of Buffalo that is the dividing line between the power suburb of Amherst and the more proletarian community of Tonawanda. Outside of a short, tree-lined and brick-paved stretch in Buffalo, Niagara Falls Boulevard was never an attractive street. However, as the sun faded, Niagara Falls Boulevard seemed even uglier than ever. Both the Amherst and Tonawanda sides of the street were lined with freestanding signs bearing electronic message centers. Many were in full animated mode, with constant chasing lights, transitions, cartoons, and the like. Storefront windows were filled with "open" signs with chasing letters and blinking frames, neon beer and lottery signs that flashed on and off, and electronic displays scrolled away in their storefronts. On the Tonawanda side, an abundance of Canadian-style portable signs, with multi-colored fluorescent letters on black backgrounds, only exacerbated the visual blight. The scene resembled Las Vegas Boulevard more so than Niagara Falls Boulevard.


The economy is recovering, but planning isn't. Where does that leave us?
By MacheteJames at 2010/04/22 - 4:00pm

The economy is beginning a slow climb out of the abyss, but the construction sector is in the gutter and will be for quite some time. Even when it starts to grow again, it won't be like it was during the boom years. Municipal budgets are eviscerated and are projected to only get worse for the next couple of years, as if there was such a thing as 'worse' than didn't involve cuts to essential government services. New grads can no longer break into the field and existing planners cannot advance in their careers. The urban planning job market has become a machine whose gears no longer turn, having become locked and fused together.

I wanted to start a thread to discuss the various options available to us. What avenues of success have people found? I know a couple of Cyburbians have found new planning gigs as of late. If there are any lurkers who have left the profession temporarily or for good, what fields are you in now, and how did you make the transition? For those of you weathering the storm in your planning gigs, what kind of projects are you working on at your office to keep planning relevant in the community, stave off stagnation, and keep yourself above water?

I know this'll generates some good discussion.


Conservative Christianity and cities

World Magazine, a conservative Christian equivalent to USNews & World Report I have read for over a decade, tackles a plethora of topics about cities in their latest edition, going so far as advocating New Urbanism, and alluding to how, in the Christian tradition, the world's story started in a garden, but will conclude (according to Revelation 21) in a well-planned city.

This is the second time this magazine has tackled urban issues, and both have pro-city, which I'm sure would strike most urbanists (who I'd say usually adhere to some variety of secular humanism) and most conservative Christians as odd because of their stereotypes of each other and themselves based on potentially false pretenses both have of urban vs. rural environments.

Present edition: http://www.worldmag.com/articles/16501

Please note that it is a conservative Christian publication, so I'm sure the exact language used might turn some of you off, but try to look beyond the minute details and to the broader points and ideas being advocated.

Thoughts?


Unemployment rate among planners: your guess?
By Dan at 2010/02/25 - 5:00pm
What do you think the unemployment rate is among professional urban planners in the United States? For the sake of argument, let's consider "planners" to include those who graduated with an undergraduate or graduate degree in urban planning a year or more ago, and those who would, when asked about their profession, say that they are a planner.

Do planners want to end sprawl?
By steel at 2010/01/29 - 5:00pm

I am curious if planners are interested in ending sprawl based planning. Or do they really think it is a good thing? Are they being led by the Civil engineers into accepting and promoting sprawl based planning? Is it the developers? the politicians? Or is sprawl planning kept on its pedestal by inertia? Is it the responsibility of planners to lead the fight against the insanity?


The failure of New Urbanism
By chocolatechip at 2010/01/28 - 7:00pm

I work for a private planning firm in California that has partnered in the past with large, well-known firms who are prominent in the New Urbanism movement. (One of our former principals was a founding member of the Congress of New Urbanism and an FAICP.) One of these firms has produced dozens of New Urbanist plans for communities all over the state, at least one dozen of which we've been privy to how things have played out because we "were there."

In almost all the cases we've been a part of, the plans have essentially disintegrated despite initial community support, political momentum, and at least some financial interest from the development community. And this has happened not just since the market meltdown... but in each case it occurred after a certain amount of time had passed, usually shortly after or during environmental review. just a couple of days ago, I got a seemingly innocuous email from one of our clients, letting us know in a gentle fashion that the City Council is going "back to the drawing board" now that we're only a couple months away from EIR certification for an 800-acre New Urbanist development. The reason? Developers and financiers don't think it's viable, and the community just doesn't like it anymore.


On James Howard Kunstler - what say ye?
By steel at 2010/01/27 - 5:00pm

William Howard Kunstler is the peek oil, doom and gloom, anti sprawl guru. He is not at all fond of the way our country is currently planned meaning he hates most of what the planning profession is doing.

I love his weekly KunstlerCast (http://kunstlercast.com/) and very much agree with most of what he says though sometimes he is a bit out there and possibly a bit self absorbed.

So what do planners think of what he is saying?


Ecovillages and intentional communities
By ruralplanner at 2010/01/26 - 5:00pm

A few years ago, while looking through old subdivision files, I came across a proposed rural subdivision that incorporated conservation subdivision design principles. This plat was in the mid-seventies. The plat covered about 300 acres of varied land features including woods, wetlands, streams, and steep ravines. There was also a map that identified ideal locations for community gardens, which seemed to incorporate aspects of the permaculture idea. The map went so far as to identify what would best grow in these areas. I think that there were about 30 small home-sites that would have been located on their own lots with the rest of the land being owned communally.

The strange thing about this proposal was that it was days away from getting final approval and at the least minute it was pulled with no reason given. It also got some media coverage as a new way of living and while the media did not come out and call it an intentional community or ecovillage—it was really that in concept. The initial covenants were very clear to this effect.


The case against the zero lot line house
By Streck at 2010/01/20 - 5:00pm
1. The up-hill side of the house will have the neighbor’s surface water run against the foundation which will be a structural problem that the owner of the house on the property line cannot prevent or correct. The Zero Lot Line owner cannot install an underground drainage system off his property to correct any drainage problem without permission (and disturbance or disruption of existing patio, ground, planting, or other structure) of his neighbor.

2. Termite treatment cannot be injected into the ground of the neighbor when the foundation is on the property line.

3. The Zero Lot line residence cannot prohibit the planting of a major tree with massive root system adjacent to his foundation. It has been demonstrated that the roots of such trees suck the moisture out of the ground, which adversely affects the foundation of houses nearby.

 
Cyburbia Forums
Discuss urban planning, career issues, the built environment, or anything else on your mind with hundreds of other planners, students, urbanists, and like-minded folks from around the world. 490,000+ posts

Threadspotting

Job Board

Announcements

Friday Afternoon Club

About Cyburbia

Cyburbia, established in 1994, is an urban planning portal and social/community site. Cyburbia includes a busy message board, image gallery, planning and urbanism-related blog feeds, a wiki, and a directory of related web sites.


     1994-2010 Cyburbia       vBulletin 3.8.6 ©2000 - 2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.